The 18 kata of Matsubayashi-ryū — an attribution table
Matsubayashi-ryū, as founded by Shōshin Nagamine in 1947, preserves 18 kata. The number itself is worth pausing on: Nagamine selected this set from a wider inheritance, drawing on his three principal teachers — Ankichi Arakaki, Chōtoku Kyan, and Chōki Motobu — to produce a curriculum that spans several centuries of Okinawan karate transmission.
This article is a reference table: who created or preserved each kata, roughly when, and the transmission path by which it reached Nagamine and entered the Matsubayashi curriculum. It’s the kind of document I want to refer back to — and have readers refer back to — rather than read straight through.
The curriculum is traditionally learned in the order given below, which is also the approximate order of historical layering: Nagamine’s own foundation kata first, then the Itosu-era pedagogical kata from the early 1900s, then the older Kyan-lineage material, and finally the kata with the deepest historical roots.
The foundation kata — Fukyūgata
| # | Kata | Creator | Approximate date | Source / transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fukyūgata Ichi | Shōshin Nagamine | 1940–41 | Nagamine’s own creation, designed as an introductory kata for general karate propagation |
| 2 | Fukyūgata Ni | Miyagi Chōjun | 1940–41 | Miyagi’s creation for the same propagation purpose; taken into the Matsubayashi curriculum by Nagamine |
The two Fukyūgata (“promoted kata”) were created in parallel by Nagamine and Miyagi Chōjun as part of an early-1940s Okinawan initiative to create accessible introductory kata for school and public teaching. That Miyagi’s Fukyūgata Ni — a kata rooted in Naha-te / Gōjū-ryū sensibilities — became part of Matsubayashi’s core curriculum reflects Nagamine’s ecumenical view of Okinawan karate.
The Itosu curriculum — Pinan and Naihanchi
| # | Kata | Creator | Approximate date | Source / transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Pinan Shodan | Itosu Ankō | 1901–07 | Itosu → Kyan → Nagamine |
| 4 | Pinan Nidan | Itosu Ankō | 1901–07 | Itosu → Kyan → Nagamine |
| 5 | Pinan Sandan | Itosu Ankō | 1901–07 | Itosu → Kyan → Nagamine |
| 6 | Pinan Yondan | Itosu Ankō | 1901–07 | Itosu → Kyan → Nagamine |
| 7 | Pinan Godan | Itosu Ankō | 1901–07 | Itosu → Kyan → Nagamine |
| 8 | Naihanchi Shodan | Ancient; pre-Matsumura | Pre-19th century | Possibly Chinese origin; transmitted through Shuri-te, preserved by Matsumura and later by Motobu Chōki, from whom Nagamine learned it |
| 9 | Naihanchi Nidan | Itosu Ankō | Early 1900s | Itosu’s extension of the Naihanchi principle; through Motobu to Nagamine |
| 10 | Naihanchi Sandan | Itosu Ankō | Early 1900s | Itosu’s further extension; through Motobu to Nagamine |
The Pinan series was Itosu’s creation during his years teaching karate in the Okinawan public school system (beginning 1901, with formal introduction typically dated 1907). Itosu distilled principles from older, more complex kata — most notably Kūsankū — into a graduated sequence suitable for young students. Pinan Yondan in particular preserves Kūsankū’s hammer-fist-during-kick motif; it is the clearest bridge between the Pinan series and its parent kata.
Naihanchi Shodan is older than any identifiable creator. It comes down through Shuri-te as the fundamental kata of the tradition — the kata on which, Motobu Chōki famously held, all other kata are commentary. Nagamine learned Naihanchi from Motobu, whose devotion to the kata was legendary. Naihanchi Nidan and Sandan were constructed by Itosu as curriculum extensions, in the same pedagogical push that produced the Pinans.
The Kyan transmission — intermediate black-belt kata
| # | Kata | Creator / source | Approximate date | Source / transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Ananku | Chōtoku Kyan | Circa 1895 | Kyan’s own creation; transmitted directly to Nagamine |
| 12 | Wankan | Matsumora Kōsaku (Tomari-te) | Mid-19th century | Tomari-te lineage; Nagamine received it in his Kyan training |
| 13 | Rōhai | Matsumora Kōsaku | Mid-19th century | Tomari-te; transmitted to Nagamine through his Kyan training |
Ananku appears to be a Kyan original, developed during his mature years. Wankan and Rōhai are Tomari-te kata preserved by Matsumora Kōsaku — the Tomari master who is the central figure for the Tomari-te inheritance in Matsubayashi. Chōki Motobu also studied with Matsumora, and both Motobu and Kyan passed these kata into Nagamine’s training.
The older-lineage black-belt kata
| # | Kata | Creator / source | Approximate date | Source / transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | Wanshū | Chinese envoy Wang Ji (tradition); Matsumora Kōsaku (kata as we have it) | 1683 attributed; Tomari-te development thereafter | Tomari-te → Matsumora → Kyan → Nagamine |
| 15 | Passai | Oyadomari Kōkan (Tomari-te) | Mid-to-late 19th century | Oyadomari’s Tomari-te version, not the Matsumura Shuri-te version; via Kyan to Nagamine |
| 16 | Gōjūshiho | Matsumura Sōkon | 19th century | Shuri-te, Matsumura line; via Kyan to Nagamine |
| 17 | Chintō | Chintō (Chinese sailor, legendary); Matsumora Kōsaku | Mid-19th century | Tomari-te; the legendary Chinese sailor Chintō taught Matsumora, who formalized the kata; via Kyan to Nagamine |
| 18 | Kūsankū | Kōshōkun / Kung Hsiang Chun (Chinese envoy) | 1761 demonstration | Demonstrated by the Chinese envoy Kūsankū in 1761 (documented in Tobe Ryōen’s Ōshima Hikki, 1762); taught Tōde Sakugawa, who taught Matsumura; via Kyan to Nagamine |
These six kata carry the deepest historical layers. Kūsankū, attested in the 1762 Ōshima Hikki as a kata descended from a Chinese envoy’s demonstration in 1761, is the oldest piece in the curriculum by documentary evidence. Chintō carries the memory of a shipwrecked Chinese sailor teaching a Tomari master in the mid-19th century. Wanshū traditionally dates to 1683, though the kata as we have it is a Tomari development of later centuries.
Passai deserves specific attention: Matsubayashi’s Passai comes through Oyadomari (Tomari-te), not Matsumura (Shuri-te). The Oyadomari Passai is distinct from the better-known Matsumura Passai of Shōtōkan and other Shuri-te styles. This is a specific inheritance Nagamine made through Kyan, who preserved both lineages but transmitted Oyadomari’s version forward.
Stream classification — Shuri-te and Tomari-te
Matsubayashi is distinctive among the Shōrin-ryū branches in consciously preserving both the Shuri-te and Tomari-te streams. The 18 kata divide:
Shuri-te roots (8 kata): Pinan Shodan through Godan, Naihanchi Shodan through Sandan, Gōjūshiho, Kūsankū. (Ananku sits ambiguously — Kyan’s creation drew on multiple sources but is generally classed Shuri-te.)
Tomari-te roots (5 kata): Wankan, Rōhai, Wanshū, Chintō, Passai (via Oyadomari). These trace through Matsumora Kōsaku in Tomari.
Matsubayashi originals (2 kata): Fukyūgata Ichi (Nagamine) and Fukyūgata Ni (Miyagi).
The choice to preserve both streams is a philosophical and pedagogical statement — Nagamine believed the two traditions illuminated each other rather than competed. Shuri-te’s long lineage of bodyguard-to-the-king techniques (Matsumura line) meets Tomari-te’s rougher, more practical sensibility (Matsumora line) in the same curriculum.
A note on “18”
The number is not accidental. Okinawan karate has a long-standing association with the number eighteen — most famously, the Chinese luóhàn (羅漢, eighteen arhats) traditions that influenced the Fujian martial arts from which much of Okinawan karate descends. Nagamine’s choice of 18 kata is a quiet acknowledgment of this longer lineage. It is also a curriculum of manageable depth: eighteen kata, each offering years of study, is enough work for a lifetime.
Further reading
- Shōshin Nagamine, The Essence of Okinawan Karate-Dō (1976, trans. Shinzato Katsuhiko)
- Shōshin Nagamine, Tales of Okinawa’s Great Masters (trans. Patrick McCarthy)
- Andreas Quast, A Stroll Along Ryukyu Martial Arts History
- Patrick McCarthy, Bubishi
- Tobe Ryōen, Ōshima Hikki (1762) — for the documentary record of Kūsankū